TSTP Solution File: NUM782^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM782^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:57:52 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 8 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
rat: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
x0: rat ).
thf(decl_23,type,
y0: rat ).
thf(decl_24,type,
z0: rat ).
thf(satz80,conjecture,
x0 = z0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hTTYVTc5b3/E---3.1_7367.p',satz80) ).
thf(j,axiom,
y0 = z0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hTTYVTc5b3/E---3.1_7367.p',j) ).
thf(i,axiom,
x0 = y0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hTTYVTc5b3/E---3.1_7367.p',i) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
x0 != z0,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz80])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
x0 != z0,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
y0 = z0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[j]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
x0 = y0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
x0 != z0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : NUM782^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:23:35 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hTTYVTc5b3/E---3.1_7367.p
% 0.14/0.40 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 7446 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.40 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # new_ho_10 with pid 7449 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.40 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.14/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.14/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.14/0.40 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.14/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 3
% 0.14/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 94
% 0.14/0.40 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.14/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.14/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------